Travel News

TSA Considering Eliminating Security Screening At Over 150 Airports

TSA precheck
Written by Charlie

According to a new proposal, TSA is considering eliminating security screening at over 150 airports around the US. This would mean 10,000 passengers a day would not be screened until before they would board a connecting flight. See the details of this proposal here.

This is somewhat of a shocker though, according to some officials, this is not the first time it has come up. According to documents obtained by CNN, there has been a working group that has put together a proposal that would eliminate TSA screening at more than 150 smaller airports around the US.

TSA Considering Eliminating Security Screening at Over 150 Airports

The Where

This TSA proposal suggests that airports that have aircraft carrying fewer than 60 passengers. This would mean more than 150 airports that are small/medium sized would no longer have TSA security screening points

The How

The proposal lays out that those passengers departing from such airports would then have screening at the larger airports they would connect to. This would affect 10,000 travelers who are currently screened by almost 1,300 TSA employees at these smaller airports now.

So, a passenger flying from a small regional airport to a larger one for a connecting flight would undergo the security process at that larger airport before boarding the next flight. If the passenger is simply flying to that city and leaving the airport, there would be no security check for them.

The Why

According to the report, such a move could save $115 million annually. This money could be directed to those larger airports to bring more and better security to them (which would also go to screening those passengers that would be connecting from those smaller airports).

The proposal also suggests that smaller aircraft are not as “attractive” of a target as larger ones so these airports may not need the security screening that we have been used to for almost 20 years now.

The WHAT?!?!

As pointed out in the CNN article, two of the 9/11 hijackers used the Portland, Maine airport because it was smaller and the security was not as tight as the airports (like Boston) where they boarded the flights they took control of.

That means that smaller airports are definitely of interest to the people that want to wreak havoc in our nation and in the aviation space. If anything, the security should be even tighter since the TSA right now really does not do that good of a job at being the first line of aviation defense.

Read the CNN article to get a complete look at some of the interviews and what the documents represent. Hopefully this article will create enough of a public outcry that this would never be implemented. Personally, out of all my travels, I think Israel does a fantastic job with their security staff being professional and knowing exactly what they are doing instead of many TSA agents who simply seem to be going through the motions of security.

Source: CNN

Featured image By Arina P Habich, Courtesy of Shutterstoc

Some of the links on Running with Miles are affiliate links that pay a commission if a purchase is made. Running with Miles is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to

About the author


Charlie has been an avid traveler and runner for many years. He has run in marathons around the world for less than it would cost to travel to the next town - all as a result of collecting and using miles and points. Over the years, he has flown hundreds of thousands of miles and collected millions of miles and points.
Now he uses this experience and knowledge to help others through Running with Miles.


  • Israel works by stereotyping. I had 30 mins of additional screening because my passport had UAE and Turkey stamps on it even though I’m Asian. But hey, it makes sense. For example, TSA could have more lax screening for someone who’s a frequent flyer but data analysis could say someone who fits a certain stereotype but rarely flies and is traveling light may be more of a suspect.

    • I realize it is a process that uses stereotyping and as someone who has been pulled aside more than once there because of whatever they figured they needed to doublecheck with me, I can say that I was still impressed. These are men and women who KNOW what they are doing. I am always amazed at how some of these early 20s agents pick out things that I would not imagine anyone catching.
      But, yeah, I imagine many people in the US would have a problem with that. 😉

  • @Hal – The liberal left would have a field day with that process…

    “How dare you screen a guy from Syria who has traveled to Iran, Egypt and Yemen in the past 6 months, but let the white guy from Kansas go through with no screening. Discrimination! Who cares if it saves money and makes us safer? The poor guy from Syria got singled out”

    Sad but this is actually how it would go.