Apple Making A Big Push With Apple Watch 3 For Runners

Apple Watch Series 2
Written by Charlie

With the release of the new Apple Watch 3 coming next week, here is what Apple doing to make the Apple Watch more important and relevant for runners.

In just a few more days, we will have all of the details about the new iPhones and the new Apple Watch 3. With many bits of information already floating around the wild, I think it is clear that Apple is making yet another effort with the Apple Watch 3 for runners.

Apple Making Big Push with Apple Watch 3 For Runners

The most searched and read post on my site over the past year has been about Apple Watch vs Garmin. This is because many people really want to know how the Apple Watch stacks up against the tried and true Garmin watches for runners and multi-sport athletes. It is clear that this has been a goal of Apple from the introduction of the very first Apple Watch and I believe we will see them demonstrate it again come this Tuesday.

How Apple Is Pushing the Apple Watch for Runners

First Apple Watch Reveal

At the introduction of the first Apple Watch, you may remember that Apple gave quite a bit of stage time to Christy Turlington Burns as she talked about how important the Apple Watch was to her and for her training for her upcoming marathon.

In fact, Apple even gave her a blog on their website for her to keep readers up to date on how her training (with the Apple Watch) was progressing. Definitely a big push to pull runners in.

Second Apple Watch Reveal – GPS 

But, the first Apple Watch had one big handicap – it needed the iPhone if you wanted to have GPS tracking. It could keep track of your runs with its built-in sensors but the numbers were always quite a bit off in my running with it.

Apple Watch Series 1 a good running watch

So, last year, Apple Watch introduced the Apple Watch Series 2 with built-in GPS. This was definitely another push for runners. Of course, it could be used for hiking, as well as other assorted activities but Apple was pushing it for being for running. With GPS, the Apple Watch Series 2 definitely became a more capable watch for runners.

Second Apple Watch Reveal – Nike 

It did not stop with GPS, though! Apple also introduced the Apple Watch Nike+. This came with exclusive Nike faces and groups. It was definitely a big push by Apple to bring in a longtime provider of running gear (as well as the company that is an exclusive partner with the USATF) to share its identity to encourage more runners to purchase and use the Apple Watch.

This Year’s Apple Watch Reveal – LTE

Rumors are strong and confident that this will be the year that Apple rolls out the Apple Watch with built-in LTE for data connectivity – independent of the iPhone. Many Apple blogs had speculated why this was even necessary and who this was targeted at. Some got it right – it is targeted at runners. Of course, anyone that wants to run to the store and leave the phone in the house can benefit as well but there are tons of runners that would love to leave their phone home but they bring it with them in case of emergency and contact (and I am in that group as well).

With an LTE-equipped Apple Watch, I (and thousands of other runners) could finally leave our phones at home without worrying about missing that important message or email. We would also be able to use FaceTime for calling (and perhaps other VoIP apps) for actually calling people in a pinch (the rumors are it will not have actual calling enabled, initially anyway). And all of that could be done while leaving our phones at home.

How Great Could the Apple Watch 3 for Runners Be?

So, could the Apple Watch 3 be the smartwatch for runners? Here are some things that I (will) love about it:

  • has onboard music storage (to stream to your Bluetooth headphones)
  • data connectivity to stay in touch on the run
  • Apple Pay to pay for anything needed while on the run
  • Apps that could be used on certain runs (for instance, Uber if you wanted to do a point-to-point run)
  • waterproof

One Negative with Apple Watch for Runners

But, there is one thing that would likely be a difficult task for Apple to overcome for now (especially with LTE) – battery life. My current watch is the Garmin Fenix 5. With all-day use and running almost every day, I can get at least 5 days (or more) out of its battery. With the Apple Watch, the battery life when using things like GPS takes a serious hit. I remember the original one would not get through a 4 hour run so improvements are being made. But, I would think it would not be something to be complete category killer until they can get 8-10 hours of running out of it and a few days of regular usage.

Some of the links on Running with Miles are affiliate links that pay a commission if a purchase is made. Running with Miles is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to

About the author


Charlie has been an avid traveler and runner for many years. He has run in marathons around the world for less than it would cost to travel to the next town - all as a result of collecting and using miles and points. Over the years, he has flown hundreds of thousands of miles and collected millions of miles and points.
Now he uses this experience and knowledge to help others through Running with Miles.


  • The Apple Watch 2 already has:

    Onboard music storage to stream to bluetooth headphones.
    Apple Pay
    Waterproof up to 50M.

    The LTE is a nice to have, but this would require a separate data plan for the device and the last time I checked, this would be minimum $5/month add on to a Verizon wireless plan for example.
    For Sprint, this would incur a separate fee of $1.99/month per line/device in addition to the cost of the data plan.

    • Right, I was including all of the things it would have in totality, including those things already in the watch.
      I am actually looking forward to trying it with Google Fi. No extra monthly fee for that and it is what I use for extra devices already. A good fit!

  • The additional connectivity costs are a deal breaker for me. Doesn’t bring enough benefits for me to justify the pngoing costs.

  • This is a points and miles/frequent flyer blog. What exactly does a plug for the new Apple Watch’s running capabilities have to do with it? Perhaps you should relocate to a fitness/running blog platform instead?

    • This blog is my blog so write what interests me in the area of travel and running! And the word “Running” is right in the title! My blog titles are quite clear so you don’t have to click if you aren’t interested.

  • Samsung has been doing LTE on their watches for years. I love the freedom of leaving the phone at home and having spotify connectivity for endless music

  • The $5 a month is well worth it in my opinion if you are not a weekend warrior. I would never go back to lugging a phone in my arm.